Analyzing the numbers vs benchmark
Compiled by M. Rockcliffe
(Click on each image to enlarge)

| 
Summary 
The  General Assembly in its Resolution 73/274
  paragraph 14, noted that the Pension Board would consider issues of
  participation, rotation and equitable representation on the Board and would
  review inter alia the composition and size of the Board, including the
  role of retiree representatives and the modalities for directly electing
  retiree representatives to the Board, and requested the Board to provide
  detailed follow-up on all aspects of the resolution including on the
  implementation of the recommendations of the Office of Internal Oversight
  Services agreed to by the Board. | 
| 
Summary 
 | 
| 
Summary 
The  General Assembly emphasized its existing
  prerogative on matters pertaining to the Fund in paragraph 5 of resolution
  73/274, and in paragraph 21 recalled that it has sole and ultimate authority
  to approve amendments to the Regulations governing the Fund;  
Furthermore
  the GA requested in paragraph 20 that the Board to consider the impact of an
  amendment of Article 6. We find that the amendment to exclude certain
  participants of the Fund, would result in a double standard and violation of Article
  8 of the United Nations Charter. | 
| 
Summary 
Paragraph General Assembly
  RES/73/274 highlighted the importance to ensure unfaltering accountability by
  the Board. 
Over the past several
  months Staff Pension Committees have been faced with disability cases where
  the official was on a “non-renewable” appointment of five years or less. 
Since disability benefits
  are based on a contributory service projected to the participant’s normal
  retirement age, the benefits derived in these cases is inconsistent with the
  temporary nature of the appointment and this loophole may often result in undue
  enrichment of those concerned | 
| 
Note by United Nations Participants’ Representatives 
to the Pension Board 
Composition of
  the Board 
2019 | 
| 
                                                                             
  Summary 
Even though the proposal
  was not unanimous and did not represent a consensus, in 2018 the Board
  proposed to amend Article 48 in an attempt to reduce the jurisdiction of the
  United Nations Appeals Tribunal The General Assembly in their resolution
  73/274 requested that the Pension Board “provide further analysis on the 2018
  proposed amendment to Article 48 of the Regulations and Rules and Pension
  Adjustment System of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund and to
  report thereon in the context of the next report.” 
The present proposal
  in the Note by the Secretary/CEO does not provide an analysis but merely
  proposes to re-submit an amendment.  It
  fails to address the underlying concerns of the General Assembly in making
  such a far-reaching change.  | 
| 
Summary 
The General Assembly in is resolution 73/274 paragraph
  14(a) noted that the Board would review The terms of reference,
  and self-evaluation methodology of Board members; The
  resolution takes note of the OIOS recommendation 1 in its report A/73/341 as follows: “The Board should: (a) establish clear terms of reference for its members outlining, inter alia, the desirable competencies for their appointment and any appropriate restrictions or limitations; and (b) review its current methodology for self-evaluation to make the exercise more effective and useful.” |