Pension Information Session

13 November 2019, UNHQ New York

http://webtv.un.org/watch/pension-information-session/6103864133001

UN Pension Fund - Analyzing the numbers, October 13, 2019

United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund

Analyzing the numbers vs benchmark

Compiled by M. Rockcliffe

(Click on each image to enlarge)

Passblue: The $67 Billion UN Pension Fund: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, October 10, 2019

"Since 2014, when staff members of the United Nations Pension Fund blew the whistle on serious mismanagement in its secretariat, a change in leadership has been made on both sides — assets and liabilities — of the $67.4 billion fund. Yet the turmoil persists.

Stabilizing the fund’s management and investment decisions has been mandated by General Assembly governance reforms that culminated in a 2018 resolution,A/RES/73/274, amid a continuing dysfunctional culture clouding the fund’s operations...."

Read the full article here:https://www.passblue.com/2019/10/10/the-67-billion-un-pension-fund-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/

UN Pension Fund - UNPR Note - Direct election of retiree representation, 2019

Note by United Nations Participants’ Representatives

to the Pension Board

Direct Election of Retiree Representation on the Board

2019

Summary The  General Assembly in its Resolution 73/274 paragraph 14, noted that the Pension Board would consider issues of participation, rotation and equitable representation on the Board and would review inter alia the composition and size of the Board, including the role of retiree representatives and the modalities for directly electing retiree representatives to the Board, and requested the Board to provide detailed follow-up on all aspects of the resolution including on the implementation of the recommendations of the Office of Internal Oversight Services agreed to by the Board.

UN Pension Fund - UNPR Note - Enhancing processing and reducing forfeitures of benefits, 2019

Note by United Nations Participants’ Representatives
to the Pension Board

Modalities to enhance the processing and reduce forfeiture of benefits

2019

Summary In its resolution 73/274 paragraph 27 the General Assembly reiterated the need to enhance processing of the receipt of payments by some beneficiaries and stressed the need for the Fund to increase efforts to address the delays and proactively resolve open workflows and legacy and other outstanding cases……” [emphasis added] Thousands of legacy and outstanding cases are covered by the General Assembly’s request. The Pension Fund is unable to locate a vast number of former participants, children, and survivors because of the lack of follow-up shortly after separation or death.  The benefits are then forfeited and re-absorbed by the Fund which defeats the purpose of the Fund created to pay benefits.

UN Pension Fund - UNPR Note - Article 6: impact of proposed amendment, 2019

Note by United Nations Participants’ Representatives 

to the Pension Board

Amendment to Rule of Procedure C.1 and

Impact of 2018 proposed amendment to Article 6

2019

Summary The  General Assembly emphasized its existing prerogative on matters pertaining to the Fund in paragraph 5 of resolution 73/274, and in paragraph 21 recalled that it has sole and ultimate authority to approve amendments to the Regulations governing the Fund; Furthermore the GA requested in paragraph 20 that the Board to consider the impact of an amendment of Article 6. We find that the amendment to exclude certain participants of the Fund, would result in a double standard and violation of Article 8 of the United Nations Charter.

UN Pension Fund - UNPR Note: Partial payments to former participants, 2019

Note by United Nations Participants’ Representatives 
to the Pension Board

Partial Payments to former participants waiting for payment over 3 months

2018

Summary

The General Assembly having taken note of the OIOS comprehensive audit of the governance of the Pension Board also  in its resolution 73/274 that the Board requested 1 that “the Fund continue to work towards meeting the target of 15 business days for benefit processing for actionable cases,” and reiterated the need to enhance the processing of the receipt of payments by some beneficiaries”  and stressed the need for implementation of a system to prioritize the resolution of the most urgent and severe cases.

Statistics provided by the Secretariat show that there are at 1000 beneficiaries whose cases are described as “actionable” who could benefit from the implementation of the proposal made in JSPB/65/R.45 and R.45 Add2.