Sunday, August 10, 2025

UN Pension Fund - UN staff pension fund investment chief’s jump to contractor sparks ethics concerns. August 10, 2025

 The sudden departure of the UN staff pension fund’s head of investment office to a firm contracted by the organisation has triggered concerns over potential violations of UN employment rules.

On 25 June, a notice appeared on the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund’s (UNJSPF) website announcing that the head of its office of investment management (OIM), Pedro Guazo, was stepping down as of 15 August, praising “his exemplary service, unwavering integrity, and visionary leadership”. The same day, the US-based Northern Trust Asset Management – the fund’s master record keeper – issued a press release naming Guazo as its new head of international and responsible investing, starting in August.


The UN's original announcement was quietly taken down that day, only to be reissued three weeks later with a much drier statement, indicating that Guazo had already left his post the day before. The timing and nature of his departure have raised eyebrows among staff. UN rules require a cooling-off period of one year before former employees may join vendors or contractors with whom they were involved in procurement matters during the previous three years.


Laura Johnson, executive secretary of the UN Staff Union in Geneva, alleges Guazo’s appointment while still in his UN role constitutes a “clear breach of the rules”. Northern Trust has been listed as the UN Pension Fund’s official master record keeper in documents dating as far back as 2018. While it isn’t clear whether Guazo interacted directly with Northern Trust, his senior role would typically entail oversight of key contracts.

Neither Guazo, Northern Trust nor the fund’s board respond to repeated requests for comment.


Staff unions have called on the secretary general, António Guterres, who appointed Guazo, to investigate the context of his departure. “We're hoping that this is being investigated within the UN, and also have questions about whether the vendor, Northern Trust, will also be investigated and held to account if found to have breached the conditions of its contract with the UN,” said Johnson. She added that the staff union was told that the UN was “looking into it”, but was not given any more details about the timeline and the scope of the inquiry.


When asked whether an investigation was underway, the deputy spokesperson of the UN secretary general, Farhan Aziz Haq, declined to comment “on internal individual personnel matters”. More broadly, he said “potential concerns regarding compliance with UN staff regulations, rules and policies are assessed in accordance with the organisation’s regulatory framework”, and that any vendor conduct is reviewed in accordance with the contract and under procurement procedures and policies. He did not address potential repercussions for violations.

Sanctions for breaching post-employment restrictions, according to UN documents, can include barring, suspending or terminating a vendor contract. For staff, the violation is recorded in their official file along with a recommendation against future employment by the UN.


Read more here: https://genevasolutions.news/sustainable-business-finance/un-staff-pension-fund-investment-chief-s-move-to-contractor-sparks-ethics-concern


UN Pension Fund - They Warned of Millions Lost in the Pension Fund. The UN Fired Them. August 10,2025

Last week, the UNDT issued a damning judgment, UNDT /2025/039, Applicant vs Secretary-General which will no doubt have the UN administration pursuing them like hell at the UNAT in an effort to reverse it.

Three bombshell findings before we dive into the details:

  1. A senior staff member who dared to raise the alarm about UNJSPF investment policies (policies that resulted in the loss of millions in staff pension money) was swiftly retaliated against and terminated. So even when your warning turns out to be spot on, you’re the one who gets punished for daring to speak up.
  2. The very rules that require staff to uphold “the highest standards of efficiency, competence and integrity,” and to promptly report breaches of UN regulations and rules, are the same ones the UN uses against you when it wants to terminate you.
  3. Once again, we’re reminded that OIOS considers itself above the law, routinely defying Tribunal orders for evidence disclosure under the classic pretext of “operational independence.”

But that’s not all.

In this case, we also learn that OIOS’s so-called “seizure of IT equipment”and subsequent “forensic search” was nothing more than a fishing expedition into a staff member’s most private data: personal WhatsApp messages included in a desperate attempt to fabricate misconduct when there was none.

We’re reminded yet again: the Ethics Office’s so-called “protection against retaliation” policy is worthless. It’s time to shut it down alongside the equally hollow Ombudsman’s office. And while we’re at it, the newly created anti-racism office, which excels in PR but is functionally useless.

This case exposes the brutal extent of the Secretary-General’s defense apparatus led by OIOS and the Office of the Secretary-General itself, which will go to extraordinary lengths to protect its own, even if it means destroying careers and staff members’ personal lives.

A former Senior Investment Officer for Fixed Income with the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund (UNJSPF), holding a continuing appointment in the Office of Investment Management (OIM) and with over 17 years of UN service, was terminated shortly after raising concerns regarding potential losses of millions of dollars in UNJSPF investments.

The staff member had joined UNJSPF in 2008, right in the middle of one of the worst financial crises in modern history, and was entrusted with managing fixed-income portfolios as head portfolio manager. But things started shifting dramatically once a new Representative of the Secretary-General (RSG) came into office. Not only were the staff member’s responsibilities narrowed, but a new Director at the D-1 level was appointed, effectively sidelining his authority.

Read more here: https://certioraris.com/2025/07/03/they-warned-of-millions-lost-in-the-pension-fund-the-un-fired-them/

Read the judgment here: https://www.un.org/en/internaljustice/files/undt/judgments/undt-2025-039.pdf