Monday, October 31, 2016

Sorry for the delay in posting comments. Please keep them coming!





Dear readers,

Apologies for delays in posting your comments. This blog is almost 18 months old and for most of its life, there were very few if any comments, which caused us to be lax in checking and posting comments. We're now doing that regularly and your comments, some several months old, have now been posted under the appropriate article. Sorry about that. For those of you whose comments included questions, we'll get back to you soonest. Please keep the comments coming.

Thank you.

CCCISUA President to Fifth Committee: Recommend search for new CEO and review governance, 27 October 2016




CCISUA PRESIDENT'S STATEMENT TO THE FIFTH COMMITTEE (TOPICS: SEPARATION PAYMENTS, COMPENSATION REVIEW, SECURITY STAFF, PENSION FUND CRISIS).

"Statement to the Fifth Committee – Common System agenda item Delivered by Ian Richards, President of the Coordinating Committee of International Staff Unions and Associations (CCISUA) At the United Nations Headquarters, New York Thursday 27 October 2016
Excellencies, distinguished delegates.
Firstly Madam Chair, allow me to congratulate you for your election.
Separation payments
We support separation payments for staff whose fixed term appointment is not renewed after ten years of continuous service.
We note that staff who have continuing appointments and staff whose fixed term appointments are cut short receive termination indemnities related to length of service, substituting for them not receiving unemployment benefit in their home country. However, those whose fixed-term appointments aren’t renewed, even after 10 or 20 years of high performing service, receive nothing.

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

CCISUA briefing on pension matters: it's our Fund (we own it)-- get involved and act for change, 11 October 2016

CCISUA Bureau (Coordinating Committee of International Staff Unions and Associations of the United Nations System) briefing on UN Pension Fund matters,

Friday, 7 October 2016, 1.15 to 2.45 pm, Conference room 11


Present: Ian Richards, CCISUA President, Egor Ovtcharenko, CCISUA Vice-President, Conditions of Service, Barbara Tavora-Jainchill, UN Staff Union President

UN staff federations took their concerns about moves to privatize the Fund to the annual Pension Board meeting held in Vienna in July 2016. Last Friday, CCISUA briefed staff at UN HQ New York on issues of continuing concern, including chronically elusive information about the extent and status of the protracted backlog in pension payments; fractious staff management relations in the Fund; retaliation against Fund staff; investment underperformance; lack of oversight and control over investment outsourcing; issues of competency and oversight in the Board coupled with increased secrecy in its activities; a need for major structural changes to preserve the health of the Fund; and some ways that the owners/stakeholder can help to bring about necessary change.

Thursday, September 8, 2016

Tsunamis of management practice, not natural disasters, beset the UN Pension Fund, 8 September 2016

Comment (posted on the Passblue website) in response to article 'Skeptics Still Question the Status of the UN's $54 Billion Pension Fund (link below):

In “Skeptics Still Question the Status of the UN’s $54 Billion Pension Fund” (link below), Susan Manuel does a credible job exposing the problems roiling the Fund, but in the telling, assigns accountability nowhere and to no one. First, the title is somewhat curious: “Skeptics still question….”. Skepticism, as in “inclined to question or doubt all accepted opinions” can be a useful trait. However, “still” implies that in the face of irrefutable evidence, some of us persist in our stubborn refusal to accept truths in front of our noses.
Rather, what the skeptics among us don’t accept is “received wisdom”, i.e., “knowledge or information that people generally believe is true, although in fact it is often false”. And we know that much of what’s proffered as truth about the Fund is false, because there’s copious evidence to the contrary.

Sunday, September 4, 2016

UN Pension Fund - New member service, 5 September 2016

UN Pension Blog received this message yesterday in an email from a retired UN colleague:

UNJSPF Member Self Service

I have been complaining for more than 18 years that the Pension Fund website did not allow participants and beneficiaries access to see their gross pension amount as well as ASHI (After Service Health Insurance) deductions, etc. As of a  few days ago, the UNJSPF now offers this service. 

In order to access the service, one logs on to the UNJSPF site, click on 'Beneficiary' or 'Participant' and click on 'Member Self Service' on the top left side of the screen. One must get a new number (as per instructions) and log on! 

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Pension matters: Retirement funds searching for better returns, 26 August 2016



Canada quietly treads radical path on pensions

Retirement funds are pushing beyond bonds and stocks in search of better returns
Among the assets controlled by Canadian pension funds are lottery operators, including Camelot; airports and toll roads including the Chicago Skyway; and vast property portfolios in New York and London © Getty Images; Bloomberg

 

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

More on investment performance and Fund health, August 17, 2016

MORE ON INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE AND FUND HEALTH: Quote from CCISUA article posted below:  "The previous Chair of the Fund assured staff that the Fund owed its healthy position in part to contributions made by participants being twice the current payments to retirees. In reality, as confirmed by the annual report, contributions are around the same level as payments. In time, as retirees exceed contributors, payments may exceed contributions. It is not a time to be complacent.
Looking ahead, it is clear that the Fund is facing a number of challenges in terms of leadership, governance, investment performance and its ability to pay retirees. In addition, further evidence has come to light regarding:
the UN’s reduced oversight of the Fund’s investments; and
the inability of the Fund’s auditors, more used to auditing governments and international organizations, to understand the unique challenges of a pension fund."