Vacancy announcement, United Nations Joint Staff Pension
Fund:
"Chief Executive Officer (CEO) - Pension Fund Administrator, ASG" (see link below).
This vacancy announcement for head of the UN Joint Staff Pension Fund Secretariat, at the level of Assistant-Secretary-General, advertises the title as “Chief Executive Officer (CEO) - Pension Fund Administrator”. That's a problem and there are a few others.
According to UN General Assembly resolution A/73/274 adopted on 23 December 2018, neither title will exist less than a year from now - January 2020.
The job title of "Pension Fund Administrator" and the description of the job functions imply that the functions of the post extend to both sides of the Fund (benefits and investments). That is not the case.
The announcement implies a five-year contract with those titles, and holds out the possibility of a possible further five-year contract under the same titles. That is not the case.
(Note that for all that, the announcement holds no worries for potential candidates' educational qualifications: “A first-level
university degree in combination with two additional years of qualifying
experience may be accepted in lieu of the advanced university degree.”)
These are the facts:
Paragraph 13 of General Assembly resolution A/73/274 , requiring sweeping reforms to address issues in the UN Joint Staff Pension
Fund, including conflicts of interest caused by the dual role of CEO and Secretary of the Pension Board, whereby the former CEO controlled the agenda including his own performance evaluation, states the following in paragraph 13:
“13. Notes the
current dual role of the Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the Board;
and decides to replace the existing post by two distinct and independent
positions as “Pension Benefits Administrator” and “Secretary of the Board” no later
than January 2020”.
The
vacancy announcement advertises for a “Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) - Pension Fund Administrator, ASG” -- not Pension Benefits Administrator -- and states that
“The CEO is an appointed position under a
five-year fixed term contract with the opportunity, upon Pension Board
approval, for one additional five-year contract.”
Again, neither of the advertised titles for the position will exist after January 2020.
“The CEO is
responsible for administering the Pension Fund servicing the stakeholders –
participants, retirees,
Pension Board members, and participating employers; and the
observance, by
all concerned, of the Pension Fund's Regulations, Rules and Pension
Adjustment
System……..The CEO is also responsible for providing a range of administrative
functions to ensure the smooth functioning of the
Investment
Management Division.”
(Note: there is no “Investment Management Division”; that office is now called the "Office of Investment Management.")
At least there's recognition that the head of the Fund
Secretariat needs a “Strong
knowledge of pension funds and/or social security schemes.” That requirement
was apparently not taken into consideration when the Selection Committee chose a former
IAEA nuclear negotiator, Janice Dunn Lee, to take over as Acting CEO last
January. Quote from the Selection
Committee:
“The Committee
concluded hat while Ms. Dunn Lee has rather limited technical and financial
knowledge of pension funds, she demonstrated managerial mastery to oversee the
UNJSPF during this transitional period.”
However, despite her "managerial mastery", “It would be important that Ms. Dunn Lee be
supported by a strengthening of the senior technical management of the UNJSPF
secretariat. The Committee unanimously agreed that this would require the
timely identification of a experienced high level financial management
specialist.”
And that
“experienced high level financial management specialist”? Former Acting CEO, Paul Dooley, who ten days after he retired on 31 December
2018 was back on contract by with the Fund by 10 January 2019 to assist Ms.
Dunn Lee’s in her “managerial mastery.”
Last July, at its annual meeting in Rome, the Pension Board rejected at least half of the findings of the UN internal audit (OIOS, A/73/341), including the major findings. In December, the General Assembly endorsed the findings, came up with recommendations for sweeping reforms, and has asked the Board to report back on key issues such as adjusting the composition of the Board, to make the distribution of seats fairer and more equitable, and to come up with modalities for UN retirees to directly elect their representatives to the Board.
The Board has been dragging its feet and making decisions by circumventing Fund regulations. This vacancy announcement is yet another example of pushback by the Board of the requirements of the Fund's ultimate oversight body, the General Assembly. If recent history is any indication, and for the sake of our Fund, time may be on the Board's side, but not for long.
Link to vacancy announcement :
https://careers.un.org/lbw/jobdetail.aspx?id=108697
Link to vacancy announcement :
https://careers.un.org/lbw/jobdetail.aspx?id=108697
No comments:
Post a Comment